Posted by ABApainter (184.108.40.206) on June 12, 2003 at 21:57:40:
In Reply to: Re: CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS for Publication of "Jaisini Gleitzeit Supermodernity" posted by Stefan Knorr on June 12, 2003 at 21:57:01:
: : : : CALL YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE SUBCONSCIOUS MIND WILL PICK UP A PAINTING THAT DOESN'T EXIST? OR PERHAPS IF IT DOES EXIST, SUB-C WILL PICK UP ALL THE ABSTRACT THINGS OF VALUE?
: : Why the concern with the Marble Lady? I realize that your concern with marbles stems from having lost your own long, long ago. I am curious, do you think your ability to read popular interpretations into something in order to fit your own world view makes you intelligent or creative? Do you hang out with people who think like you or do you search out new ideas that are utterly new? Are 'female identity fiction' and 'Post-feminism' terms you can even define, or did you find them in some first year Woman's Studies Course? I am not a subscriber to the "Penis Power Quarterly" although I found it amusing. In fact, those were the only three entertaining words in your message. Why are you so serious? I don't know you from Adam (or perhaps I should say Eve lest I succumb to male dominated moral hegemony). Perhaps you subscribe to "Vagina Power Weekly". I don't know. Why the obsession with the male/female power struggle? How could you possibly know what the artist intended to show, or what he meant by all the elements? There tremendous leaps in logic in your prose, in which one interpretation supports another supposition ad nauseum until it appears you have proven a point. Much of academia is built on such logic and this inherent flaw has weakened many of the social sciences. The logic of such arguments is based on the presumption that as long as the central hypothesis is 'correct' it does not matter what flaws exist in the logic used to arrive at said hypothesis. I suggest that you paint your own picture...write your own story... create your own dream...you obviously have the potential as a thinker but are hindered out of your concern with being 'correct' and seem to think that the cannon of 'great' works defines the only important source of inspiration. THINGS TO PONDER....
: Zeit begleitet mich. Ich gleite mit der Zeit. Ich bin der gleitzeitgeist.
tis an art beyond depressionism it harmonizes the concrete in an non objective way with an all over omni directional megalomania. its esoteric drama is totally on the surface and deterritorialized as sign through superlinearity it folds and unfolds like a card table as abstract machine functioning within the autonomous strata of art against art. it refuses to have a frame and can be seen by the blind it begs to be put in the center and speaks of proximity and law without concepts. its topic is the void an enterprise with an Asiatic non despotic formation beyond Marx Freud and henry ford. its an art that can hear but cannot say and spreads across the floor like milk without heat yet not cold. a hyper bourgeoisie flow overcoding mutation as assemblage where no assemblage be a sort of beginners guide in a manner of speaking to unequal exchange but on the other hand non controlling escaping to the periphery.
Post a Followup